Cancer Cure, at Last

$10 Report: Click Here, Now

Review of a Legitimate Research Company Dedicated to Eradicating Cancer.

You are never told the truth about cancer incidence

Cancer is growing by leaps and bounds. In 1960, 1 in 4 people would be diagnosed with cancer before they died. In 1980, it was 1 in 3. Now, it is 1 in 2. In just the last 40 years cancer incidence is up a shocking 50%! This year alone, over 1,500,000 Americans will get cancer.

You are never told the truth about cancer death

Death from cancer is on the rise; experts say it will soon overtake heart disease as America's #1 killer. This year, over 750,000 Americans will die from cancer.

You are never told the truth about what causes cancer.

Cancer is usually triggered by toxic chemicals - not only tobacco - but industrial chemicals, pollutants, and radioactive substances in our food, air, water, and environment.

You are never told the truth about pesticides and other environment poisons

Recently, the FDA found traces of 60-80 toxins pesticides in the average American food basket.

And, most recently from (Business Wire) -- ExpertSource: "An investigation, conducted by the Associated Press, found traces of pharmaceuticals in the drinking water supplies in 24 major U.S. metropolitan areas, according to an article by the Associated Press". (Distilled Water -- not filtered water - might be the only solution to keep these cancer producing elements out of our body?)

You are never told the truth about cancer prevention

We can lower our risk of cancer by eliminating carcinogens from the food, water, air, and environment. There is good evidence that we can protect ourselves against many toxins if we eat organic food. There is also good scientific evidence that we can significantly lower the risk of certain cancers with dietary changes and nutritional supplements.

You are never told the truth about conventional cancer therapy

For decades, the cancer establishment has foolishly relied upon the crude and primitive treatments of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, as their only weapons. These therapies are generally dangerous, toxic, largely ineffective, and highly profitable.

You are never told the truth about the "war on cancer"

The truth is that conventional methods of treatments are losing the "war on cancer." The cancer establishment has promoted one "magic bullet" after another - first radiation, then chemotherapy, then interferon, then interleukin-2. Where are they now? Each one of these turned out to be little more than a public relations ploy to sell dangerous, toxic, ineffective therapies that were extraordinarily profitable.

Why should today's "cures" be any different? Since President Richard Nixon declared the "war on cancer" in 1975, America has spent over $2,000,000,000,000 (2 trillion dollars) in their "war on cancer." It is a "war not won." Incredibly, in most cases, you have no better chance of being cured today than in 1975! --- [By following the misinformation fed to us by the traditional establishment, that prefer to make a life-long career of treating symptoms with dangerous and very costly therapy -- that in most cases, can be ineffective in actually curing the Cancer].

You are never told the truth about the massive human risks of toxic chemicals

In 2003, the government found between 100 and 300 poisons in the blood of average American citizens. The government has done nothing to remedy this deadly situation.

Has anyone really questioned our government, as to where many of these poisons are coming from? And Why? You might be surprised when you take a look at the misinformation that the public is being fed by our Politicians.... [ Take a look at some of the evidence here (Chemtrails) ]

You are never told the truth about chemotherapy

Chemotherapy does not increase survival or improve the quality of life in 85% of all human cancers. Chemotherapy is toxic - not only to cancer cells - but also to the healthy cells. Chemotherapy weakens the immune system. Incredibly, chemotherapy itself actually causes cancer. Still, toxic, dangerous, and profitable chemotherapy is given to millions of Americans each and every year.

You are told the truth about People Against Cancer

People Against Cancer is exposing the truth about cancer. We are meeting with government officials. We are meeting with our representative in Congress. We are testifying in Congressional Hearings. We are testifying before select White House Committees. We are demanding fair testing of promising innovative therapies that are safe, effective, and inexpensive.

We are demanding the truth be given to the American people and be put in effect by the cancer establishment. ["Have you ever wondered who the most powerful lobbyists are in the United States - that control the FDA -- Of course you have, and it's like "putting the fox in charge of the hen house" -- Some of the most powerful lobbyist in the country are the Pharmaceutical Companies and the 'Quack Medical Profession', that Prefer to "treat symptoms" for a life-time, thus keep the American Public Slave to their Trillion dollar Profit Machines Without getting completely to the core of the problem, ... and providing a complete Cure For Cancer."] As you can plainly see, It's all about PROFITS.

You are never told the truth about radiation therapy

Radiation is toxic at every level - not only toxic to cancer cells but toxic to all healthy cells. There is no level of radiation that does not cause mutations in every living organism ever tested. Incredibly, radiation itself actually causes cancer.

You are never told the truth about innovative cancer therapies

There are promising new methods of treating cancer that are safe, non-toxic, natural, and often inexpensive. A recent study by the US Congress found nearly 200 scientific studies supporting such approaches and called on the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to evaluate them. The NCI refused. [End]

To get more information on cancer and what we can do to help you, Submit your email address

for a Free copy of the People Against Cancer brochure!

Commitment to Cancer-Free Health

CANCER CURE,

At Last ?...

.... My Beloved Dad, at a much too early age, suffered and died of Cancer many years ago. The information, now available wasn't at our disposal at that time.

But from that moment on -- I made it one of my Major Commitments to search out and find the most Valid Information that is available, to once and for all, Prevent & wipe out that dreaded Disease.

That is now My Quest.. As a Memorial to my Dad, I'll Never give up till this disease is eradicated..

...And the quack Doctors and Multi-Billion Dollar Drug Companies are Exposed, for keeping the Truth from the World. .... David Holt, FSP

Do Conventional Doctors & Pharmaceutical Companies Really Want an Immediate Cure for Cancer or do they Crave the Life-long Treatment Profits?

You May Be the Key to Cancer Prevention

By Serena Gordon, HealthDay Reporter

SATURDAY, March 29 (HealthDay News) -- Imagine therapies that could cut cancer deaths in half.

Well, these "breakthrough" treatments are here, according to a recent American Cancer Society report that said as many as 50 percent of cancer deaths could be prevented with lifestyle changes, such as quitting smoking, maintaining a healthy weight, and getting screened for certain malignancies.

"Nearly half of all cancer is related to two things -- tobacco and obesity," said Dr. Jay Brooks, chief of hematology/oncology at Ochsner Health System in Baton Rouge, La. "That's something I don't think people truly grasp."

Dr. Neil Hayes, a medical oncologist specializing in lung and head and neck cancers at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, concurred. "Most of my patients are smokers, so it's rare I see someone truly surprised by the diagnosis. But I don't think they fully think through the risk associated with smoking," he said.

Evaluating your risk of cancer, and taking steps to modify those risk factors within your control, could save your life.

Smoking is far and away the leading cause of preventable cancer deaths. In the United States, nearly one-third of all cancer deaths -- more than 170,000 Americans -- each year are related to tobacco use, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS). Yet, almost one in four American adults still uses tobacco. And, about 22 percent of teens are still lighting up.

"Not smoking is the single most important thing you can do to lower your risk of cancer," Brooks said.

Another important risk factor cited by the cancer society is the increasing girth of the average American. Poor nutrition, lack of exercise, and excess weight are likely at the root of as many as 188,277 cancer deaths annually, according to the ACS.

A recent New England Journal of Medicine study that included more than 900,000 U.S. adults found that the heaviest people had the highest risk of death -- 52 percent higher for men and 62 percent for women -- compared to people of normal weight.

However, what isn't yet known, Hayes said, is if proper nutrition can prevent that increased risk. "We have an incomplete understanding of diet's impact on cancer. But a healthy lifestyle is associated with all kinds of good things," he said.

The ACS recommends eating at least five servings of fruits and vegetables a day, and getting at least 30 to 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity at least five days a week. Walking, biking and skating are examples of moderate activity, while jogging, fast bicycling, weight training, aerobics and swimming are considered vigorous activity.

Hayes said too much alcohol is also associated with some cancers, particularly tumors of the esophagus, pharynx, and mouth. The ACS recommends that women drink no more than one alcoholic beverage a day and men no more than two alcoholic drinks a day.

Then there's the lifesaving issue of screenings. Some cancer screenings, such as those for skin, breast, cervical and colon cancers, can actually detect precancerous changes that may eventually lead to malignancies.

For instance, with a colonoscopy a doctor can find and remove polyps before they turn into cancer. The ACS report estimated that as many as half of the 55,000 colon cancer deaths that occur each year could be prevented with proper screening.

"Aside from avoiding tobacco and maintaining a healthy body weight, cancer screening is the most important thing people can do to reduce their chances of dying from cancer," the ACS report stated.

More information

To learn more about cancer prevention, visit the Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation.

SOURCES: Neil Hayes, M.D., assistant professor of medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill; Jay Brooks, M.D., chief, hematology/oncology, Ochsner Health System, Baton Rouge, La.

Click Here

Click to Mail to Friends

Rersearch Articles

Join News Letter

Brain Cancer Linked to Nerve Agent in Gulf War Vets

By Liz Szabo, USA TODAY

For the first time, a study has found an increase in brain cancer deaths among Gulf War veterans who might have been exposed to the nerve agent sarin by the destruction of Iraqi weapons in 1991.

About 100,000 of the 350,000 Army soldiers in the Persian Gulf could have been exposed to sarin after soldiers blew up two large ammunition caches in Khamisiyah, Iraq, in March 1991, according to a study commissioned by the military and performed by the Institute of Medicine. The institute advises the government on health policy.

At the time, the military didn't know that the destroyed Iraqi rockets contained sarin, says Michael Kilpatrick, deputy director for the Deployment Health Support Directorate in the Department of Defense. Soldiers showed no signs of exposure to chemical warfare.

Later, however, United Nations inspectors found that some of the weapons contained sarin, which can cause convulsions and death. The military has since contacted about 300,000 veterans who were in or near areas that might have been affected. The potential "hazard area," where shifting winds could have carried traces of chemicals, extended at times as far as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

According to the study, soldiers inside the "hazard area" were about twice as likely as those outside it to die from brain cancer. Because the actual number of brain cancer cases was small, the overall mortality rate was the same for veterans in the hazard area and outside the area, according to the study, published in the American Journal of Public Health.

Among unexposed soldiers, researchers found a brain cancer death rate of 12 per 100,000 from 1991 to 2000, says William Page, director of the study. Over the same period, researchers found 25 brain cancer deaths per 100,000 veterans who were exposed.

"It's a doubling of risk, but it's still a pretty small risk," says Page, a senior program officer at the Institute of Medicine.

The study did not address "Gulf War syndrome," as some have called the collection of ailments experienced by returning veterans. It examined whether soldiers possibly exposed to the destruction of Iraqi weapons were more likely to die for any reason. They also singled out specific diseases: breathing problems, infections, circulatory problems, digestive ailments, accidents and suicides, as well as four types of cancer.

The study's authors note that sarin has never been shown to cause cancer. Page suggests that researchers follow veterans to see whether the risk of brain cancer, which is believed to develop over 10 to 20 years, changes over time. Page also notes that the study doesn't prove that being in the hazard area caused brain cancer.

Melissa Bondy, a professor of epidemiology at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, questions why only one or two days of exposure would increase brain cancer mortality. Other experts note that the study could shed light on the causes of brain tumors, about which doctors know little.

"It's a very solid study," says Faith Davis, a professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago. "It needs to be taken seriously." [End]

Current Updates

No Dose of Radiation – No Matter How Low - Can be Deemed to Be Completely Safe

“The report largely strengthens conclusions about the risks of cancer from radiation” -Richard Monson, of Harvard and Ethel Gilbert, of the National Cancer Institute

The report said the best evidence suggests that even "the smallest dose has the potential to cause a small increase in risk to humans.”

Low Radiation Doses Still Pose Risk, Panel Finds By Shankar Vedantam Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, June 30, 2005; A07

The health risk posed by radiation from X-rays and other medical procedures is so small that it should not deter people from seeking needed medical care, according to a panel of senior scientists who examined the risks of low-level radiation.

Although the risks from such radiation are small, the panel assembled by the National Research Council also concluded that there is no dose of radiation, however low, that can be deemed completely safe.

Richard Monson, professor of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health and the chairman of the science panel, said people should consult with their physicians before choosing optional medical services such as whole-body computerized tomography (CT) scans -- an increasingly popular diagnostic tool intended to detect medical problems at an early stage.

Monson was careful to say that there is no clear evidence that such scans, which subject people to about 100 times the radiation of a chest X-ray, are harmful. Rather, he said, people should follow the common-sense dictate of avoiding radiation whenever possible, especially when their physicians do not think such interventions are necessary.

The report is the seventh in a series of reports termed the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation being issued by the nation's premier science, engineering and medical advisory group, the National Academies.

Environmental advocates said the report's findings represent a victory because some pro-nuclear groups have advanced the argument that radiation below a certain low threshold is harmless or even beneficial.

The report said the best evidence suggests that even "the smallest dose has the potential to cause a small increase in risk to humans."

It estimates that the amount of radiation in about 10 whole-body scans, or about 1,000 chest X-rays, would result in a 1 percent risk of developing cancer if it were delivered all at once.

Monson and Ethel Gilbert, a biostatistician at the National Cancer Institute, said the report largely strengthens conclusions about the risks of cancer from radiation.

"From a public health point of view, prudence is a guideline," Monson said. "What is unnecessary radiation is up to the individual."

Daniel Hirsch, president of the Committee to Bridge the Gap, and Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, both nonprofit advocacy groups, said the numbers identified by the report show that the risks of radiation and cancer are greater than previously thought and warrant strengthened regulation.

Paul H. Genoa of the Nuclear Energy Institute, however, said the report confirms long-held industry views about low-level radiation: "The risks are very small, and the current regulations are protective of public health and safety." [End]

What Radiation Dose is Safe?...

Name:

e-mail:

You're Never Told the Truth...

86 % CURE RATE for Hopeless Cancer Patients

& Lies Doctor's Tell You

The Con Is On .....

Dear Reader,

The very best con man might not fit your idea of what a con man looks and acts like.

For instance, some con men wear stethoscopes around their necks.

I'm not talking about doctors in general, I'm talking about a certain type of oncologist who knows how to work the system, tell his patients what they want to hear, and turn a nice profit.

If you or someone you know or love has cancer (and unfortunately, that covers just about all of us), you have to be on the lookout for one of the cruelest and most disturbing con jobs in medicine.

------------------------------------------------------

Drugged and duped

------------------------------------------------------

It starts with a practice known as "chemotherapy concession." We'll call it "Chemo Con."

Here's how it works...

An oncologist purchases chemotherapy drugs directly from drug companies, then bills the patient's insurer.

But there's a little wrinkle here that patients never hear about: Oncologists typically get a deep discount off the "sticker" price of the drugs. Then they bill insurers for the sticker price, which is sometimes more than 20 percent higher than the amount paid by the doctor.

Believe it or not, that's not the con. In fact, this practice is completely legal and considered a "concession" to offset oncologists' overhead costs. The con occurs when an oncologist uses a chemo drug that he knows will not be effective, or administers it to a patient he knows will get no benefit.

And as awful as that sounds, it happens. A LOT.

A few years ago, a researcher (who happened to be a practicing oncologist) examined the medical records of almost 8,000 cancer patients. He found that in cases where chemo was given in the final six months of life, ONE-THIRD of the patients had cancers that are known to be unresponsive to chemotherapy.

In other words, thousands of cancer patients and their families were duped, while chemo concessions were harvested.

But hold onto your hats. It gets even worse...

------------------------------------------------------

Supreme sacrifice

------------------------------------------------------

In 2005, the Medicare Modernization Act curbed chemo concession claims. Under the new plan, Medicare....

(Read More...)

Videos:

How To Cure Almost Any Cancer At Home For $5.15 A Day

Cancer Cure Secrets:

...How to Overcome Cancer, Non-Toxic & Inexpensive.

Articles: